During the lesson…
Christoph asked the class, “Who think that Wikipedia is better?”
I didn’t raise my hand.
Christoph asked the class again, “Who think that printed Encyclopedia Britannica is better?”
I still didn’t raise my hand.
My classmate Natalie asked me, “Why didn’t you raise up your hands to both choices?”
I replied her, “It depends on what kind of information you are looking for.”
But WAIT! Natalie reminded me that actually I have NEVER used a printed Encyclopedia before. I didn’t even know how it is written differently compared with Wikipedia. Whenever I want to search for information, I go to Wikipedia. Wikipedia can always satisfy me with more than sufficient information and data. There is NO NEED for me to turn to a printed Encyclopedia. Wikipedia is up-to-date, user-friendly and richly informative. Why do we need to check out the printed ones when Wikipedia can satisfy all our needs?
The information in Wikipedia is so rich that even the detailed biography of a small character in TVB can be found. You are definitely not able to find any information about her in the printed Encyclopedias.

See her biography in wikipedia!
The information in Wikipedia covers such a wide variety and is so rich that if it is printed out, it will probably looks like this:

In the era of Internet and technology, Wikipedia has a lot of advantages that the printed Encyclopedias has not. Now, if Christoph or Rodney asks me once again whether Wikipedia or printed Encyclopedia Britannica is better, I will definitely say WIKIPEDIA!